|
*****************************************************
Wow, who peed in your cornflakes this morning? I guess the next time somebody comes here with what seems to be a disaster in the making we will just applaude and say all will be well.
I'm glad your marriage is working out. Not everyone is so fortunate. Sometimes its their own fault, sometimes it isn't. Still when someone posts their story here, they are inviting comments. No one has to post their story if they don't want to, but once they do, its everyones right to comment on it. Some comments will be insightful, others foolish; some diplomatic and polite others shrill and rude. When someone steps over the line, usually a moderator steps in.
I'm not sure what more one can expect.
*****************************************************
Well, looking at my clock and seeing where you live, I don't see how I wrote this in the morning? I'm watching the Patriots play at this moment, a team I'm unusually rooting for because of Survial Football. I could be out.
When a person posts a question, that person is looking for opinions, yet, you go back and read the thread about Clyde and tell me it was "just opinions." See how the "tone" was in the opinions. I think I have only responded in a blunt manner one time on this board that was crossing the line by telling some guy he was whatever the name is for going after kids. But, I can respond in a sarcastic manner and still get my point across. All I'm saying is if a person asks a question, it's possible to communicate without blunt, condescending words. That's all.
*****************************************************
I could not help to respond to this. Lysander, you used some valid words in your statement, "[b:2150f4da29][u:2150f4da29]Seems to be a disaster in the making." [/u:2150f4da29][/b:2150f4da29]Well sir, go back and read "Is It Smart To Be A One Week Wonder." That Russian women thread was about me, yet, 2 years later I'm still here under a different and more appropriate name. I dropped off for while, mainly because I kept hearing the same arguements, yet, 2 years later, I'M STILL HERE! But nobody will debate with me now on that subject. They know results always eat away at opinions.
So, when you say specifically that Clyde's situation is "[b:2150f4da29][u:2150f4da29]a disaster in the making" [/u:2150f4da29][/b:2150f4da29], how do you know that? My situation was indirectly given the same result, yet, this One Week Wonder is still ticking. So, how can you say that Clyde's situation is a disaster in the making. You can only justify that by what you think of his opinion. We are not dealing with a man who sent money to a lady he didn't know. We are discussing a relationship, sir. So, if you are correct after the end result, pat yourself on the back, but, also, pat yourself on the back like those 2 years ago did with me. I would hope you would not fall into the category of the know it alls.
P.S. I know you're a 1wkwonder
*****************************************************
Even though I didn't contribute, in any way, to departure, I don't doubt that you consider me to be a "know-it-all," in any case.
Since you are not reluctant to post your unfiltered thoughts, it seems a bit unfair to expect others to adhere to higher standards than you are willing to live up to yourself. If you have a reasonable explanation as to why it is acceptable for you to call others "a bunch of jerks," but it is not acceptable for them to call Clyde "spineless," then I would love to hear it.
I noted that your friend, Andrew, produced some especially insightful and helpful posts. I did not notice that you gave him any well-deserved praise for it. Perhaps you have a bad attitude about him because of the way that he has skillfully flayed you alive in the past. Under the circumstances, one would expect that you would understand why others may have a bad attitude when they read about weakness of epic proportions.
People who are thin-skinned should probably limit their posts to the newby discussion, where the moderators do not allow as much latitude.
p.s. It would be my pleasure to debate you about your situation now, provided that you would do so without fallacious argument or personal attack.
|
|
